Skip to content
Share this post!

Rockford Scanner: ISP adopted updates approved by the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules (JCAR) to the administrative rule governing Clear and Present Danger reporting under the Firearm Owners Identification Card (FOID) Act.

 








 

ISP adopted updates approved by the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules (JCAR) to the administrative rule governing Clear and Present Danger reporting under the Firearm Owners Identification Card (FOID) Act.

 

SPRINGFIELD – The Illinois State Police (ISP) is increasing public safety by providing updates and clarity to two firearm ownership tools aimed at keeping firearms out of the hands of those who pose a significant threat to themselves or to others.
Today, ISP adopted updates approved by the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules (JCAR) to the administrative rule governing Clear and Present Danger reporting under the Firearm Owners Identification Card (FOID) Act. The updated rule, which allows for a broader use of Clear and Present Danger reports, was proposed in the wake of the July 4, 2022 shooting in Highland Park. Clear and Present Danger reporting is a mechanism upon which ISP may revoke or deny a FOID for an individual who poses a serious threat.
“When determining whether to issue or revoke a FOID card, it is imperative ISP has as much information and evidence as possible,” said ISP Director Brendan F. Kelly. “Updates to this administrative rule will strengthen ISP’s ability to keep firearms out of the hands of dangerous individuals.”
Prior to the Clear and Present Danger Emergency filing in July 2022, administrative rules required a subject’s clear and present danger had to be “impending,” or “imminent.” The statutory definition in the FOID Act, more broadly defines Clear and Present Danger as simply requiring “physical or verbal behavior, such as violent, suicidal, or assaultive threats, actions, or other behavior.” The changes to the approved rule makes the definition of “clear and present danger” more consistent with what is written in the FOID Act and is not constrained by the immediacy of a situation. The broader definition can better inform current or future decisions on FOID card revocations or denials based on risks to public safety.
The rule outlines that Clear and Present Danger reports submitted to ISP from a certified medical professional, school administrator, or law enforcement agency that don’t meet the definition of Clear and Present Danger under the FOID Act will be retained for five years, similar to other mental health reports submitted by mental health practitioners and facilities. The rule change also allows ISP to maintain and use a Clear and Present Danger report in instances when the individual did not have a FOID card or was not actively seeking a card at the time the Clear and Present Danger report was submitted. The rule will be included in the upcoming Illinois Register.
Another tool to increase public safety is the Firearms Restraining order (FRO), which allows law enforcement officers and family or household members to obtain a court order temporarily restricting an individual who is determined to be at risk of harming themselves or others from securing or maintaining access to firearms, ammunition, or firearm parts while respecting the individual’s constitutional rights and providing a judicial procedure for challenging the Order.
ISP Firearm Ownership
The Commission on Implementing the Firearms Restraining Order Act (Commission) recently approved a model policy to provide an overall framework law enforcement can follow to secure and execute a Firearms Restraining Order (FRO).
“It is important law enforcement agencies know how to safely and legally execute a Firearms Restraining Order,” said Director Kelly. “The model policy created by the Commission contains procedures that allow law enforcement agencies to comply with all firearms laws while respecting individuals’ constitutional and due process rights.”
The policy addresses procedures for law enforcement in the following areas among others:
– petitioning for a FRO (either emergency or six-month)
– serving a FRO issued by the court
– securing firearms, ammunition, and firearm parts surrendered by subject of the FRO
– executing a FRO search warrant
– returning firearms, ammunition, or firearm parts
– attending court hearings
– training
Each Illinois law enforcement agency may make small modifications to the model policy but must adopt a policy that aligns with the model.
The Commission was created through Public Act 102-0345 and appointed on June 8, 2022 to develop the model policy with consultation from Illinois counties and others states with similar laws that have seen successful implementation.
The Commission is chaired by ISP Director Kelly and includes the following members:
– Gregory E. Ahern, Jr. – Judge, Circuit Court of Cook County
– Lance Camp – Henry County Public Defender
– Cordelia Coppleson – Assistant Attorney General, Illinois Attorney General’s Office
– Kevin Doyle – Sheriff, Putnam County Sheriff’s Office
– J. Hanley – Winnebago County State’s Attorney
– Jodi Hoos – Peoria County State’s Attorney
– Russ Idle – Chief, Galesburg Police Department
– Ana Lalley – Chief, Elgin Police Department
– Mike Magno – Lieutenant, Chicago Police Department
– Jennifer Martin – Violence and Injury Prevention, Illinois Department of Public Health
– Jamie Mosser – Kane County State’s Attorney
– Darren Popkin – Sheriff, Montgomery County, Maryland, Law Enforcement Expert
– Eric Rinehart – Lake County State’s Attorney
– Cheryllynn Williams – Deputy Director, Illinois Law Enforcement Standards Training Board
– Dan Wright – Sangamon County State’s Attorney
– Kimberly Wyatt – Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, King County Prosecutor’s Office, National District Attorneys Association Designee
The model policy can be found on the ISP website at https://isp.illinois.gov/Foid/StatutoryRegulation.









We keep everyone ANONYMOUS,
Unless you let us know to credit your name.










Get one of the best
Police scanner on the market!




 

Rockford Scanner:
Bringing you our personal opinions of what may have possibly happened,
Based on the information that is currently provided to us.
We highly recommend you doing your own research
And forming your own opinions on the topic.
Our information is very dynamic,
We can not guarantee the accuracy of the information.
If you know of any errors, contact us: RockfordScanner@gmail.com
And provide us with the proof of the error.
Simple communication and transparency,
Would eliminate any misinformation or exaggerations…


We can not guarantee the accuracy of our information.  If you know of any errors, please contact us at RockfordScanner@gmail.com and please provide us with the proof of the correction.  We strive for accuracy, however the information is always dynamic and changes often with our type of content.  We do apologize ahead of time, if there are any errors.  Please let us know!  Simple communication and transparency, would eliminate any misinformation or exaggerations… We are protected under the first amendment. 

Disclaimer and Terms:  CLICK HERE